Lately, he has mentioned vaccines again. He is against the continuing COVID shots. Some people think they're better off because they got the vaccine; others think they're better off because they didn't. What is the truth about the vaccine? Good luck to both sides, I say. In the long run, does it make me any happier to feel I'm going to live a few years longer because I got the vaccine, if just everyday living doesn't bring me much satisfaction? If I'm suspicious all the time? I'm angry? Or depressed? What's the point in desperately trying to prolong life if that's the case? And I say that because my friend is often depressed and unhappy.
In relief, I may not come down with a vaccine-related illness, but there are a multitude of other chemically manufactured illnesses to contract through the very air I breathe and the food I eat, let alone a government that can dictate my freedom, abscond with my bank account and put me in jail if they so desire. In the end, my knowing the truth about vaccines won’t change the guy's opinion down the street any more than it will change the way the government and big business operate. No demonstrations, nor heavenly prophets, nor conspiracy theorists, will change the system.
Even those who think everything is a conspiracy, even they argue among themselves as to which is the ‘true’ conspiracy. JFK is a good example. When presented with credible information, such as the James Files’ confession, which was dissected, examined, and analyzed excessively by highly esteemed professionals, some people still declared it a silly conspiracy theory, before deeming it invalid.
Alex Jones is an example of someone obsessively fixated on the 'truth.' The families of Sandy Hook sued him after he publicly said it never happened. He lost the case in court. He has some good things to say and many truths to share, but if he really wants to convince people of cover-ups, lies, government collusion and murders, why present the information in such a nutty fashion as to make himself unbelievable? That in itself it suspect. Telling others the truth in such a way will turn people away, like a government mis-information tactic. The CIA is very smart in manipulating the foolish public. After 9/11, he was getting more mainstream, was getting more attention, but he ruined his coverage with his manic, spitting, eye-popping demeanour. He squandered his credibility. Many times I've said that I don't believe the official 9/11 story, only to be told I'm listening to too much Alex Jones.
For this event to be analyzed, go to the source and find out the details. Talk to those who lost children; evidently, 20 children were killed. Go to the school where it 'presumably' happened and see if there are any identifying gunshot holes in the walls/floors/ceiling. Talk to witnesses, emergency respondents, firefighters, policemen, neighbours, other school kids. Did Alex Jones do that? No, he didn't; he just proclaimed it a hoax.
What about all the other school shootings? Are they a hoax? And why is just the Sandy Hook shooting a hoax? There are hundreds of school shootings a year in the States. Sometimes the conspiracies that people are positive about are just as fake as the lies the government puts forth. Why would the government manufacture a story about a lunatic kid who goes off and shoots people? It’s nonsensical in this case.
Unfortunately, children are being desensitized to war, assault, rape, and exploitation. When I was a child, there were no violent and brutally graphic movies, there was no widespread drug addiction and homelessness, nor the lack of social support, the unfair laws and privatized prisons, the breakdown in morality and social values, the anger, the unparalleled inequality and agreed, the destruction of family, the exploitation of children and the near anomie we're living with today. We have become a nation of victims wanting our rights, looking for justice and retribution. No one trusts the government because they're all a bunch of lying, untrustworthy, thieving crooks. Everyone thinks individually, and most think their opinion is correct, so there is almost no consensus.
Viewing old videos and photos of black neighbourhoods, men weren't walking around gang banging, loitering on street corners selling drugs, robbing stores, stabbing strangers, shooting at each other, thug-walking and carving up neighbourhoods into territories. There was segregation and racism, but within their own black neighbourhoods, in their own society, there was normalcy and perhaps some joy, self-respect, family structure, honour, and by the looks of their musical venues and musical geniuses, a helluva lot of dancing and fun on the weekends. Of course, there were many problems, many, but has life improved for them now that they're 'free' and integrated? The new black is the poor white trash addicted to meth and fentanyl. One theory says that the American government deliberately destroyed prosperous black neighbourhoods, i.e. Tulsa, in order to destroy their rising prosperity. Crack cocaine served the Govt very well in that regard. So, yes, there are conspiracies. If you believe that two or more individuals got together to commit a crime, that's a conspiracy theory. If you can prove it, it's no longer a theory; it’s a fact.
Alex Jones' level of hysteria makes him suspect. If one could comfortably stand in front of a roomful of parents who have lost their children to a shooter and tell them you're skeptical, then you have bigger cajones, or a smaller heart, than imagined.
No comments:
Post a Comment